Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the change brought about by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975 with effect from 1 April 1976, the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner retained jurisdiction to impose penalty under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 in respect of penalty proceedings culminating in orders passed in March 1977.
Analysis: The question was answered by applying the earlier binding decision on the identical issue, which held that, on the altered statutory position, the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had ceased to be the competent authority to impose penalty after the relevant change took effect. Since the penalty orders were passed after 1 April 1976, they lacked jurisdictional support.
Conclusion: The answer was given in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to pass the penalty orders.