2010 (3) TMI 1258

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Anoop V. Mohta, J. 1. The petitioner is challenging the impugned orders whereby both the Courts below directed the respondent-original complainant to continue in the job inspite of termination notice whereby the petitioner considering the conviction order passed by the Competent Court, terminated the services as per Rule 10(a) Maharashtra State Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he order, based upon the conviction order passed by the competent Court. In the present case submission is that there are no sufficient reasons made out for termination which in my view is not correct basically in view of the existing rule as reproduced above. The fact about the conviction as mentioned above itself is sufficient reasoning just cannot be overlooked mainly because there is appeal fi....