Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (1) TMI 339

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and connected cases pending before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Tirur. The cases originated from complaints filed by the 1 st respondent against the petitioner and another, alleging commission of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. In the complaint it is alleged that the petitioner, in his capacity as a Director of the 1 st accused Company, had entere....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt trial. During the course of such trial, the petitioner filed an application seeking to send the cheques for expert opinion regarding the entries therein. The said application stands rejected by Annexure A1 order and hence this Crl.M.C. 2. The application seeking expert opinion was filed on the premise that, during his cross examination, the complainant had testified that, except the amount in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ining handwriting experts opinion would in no way help the court to arrive at a just decision in the case. 5. Sri. N.K.Mohanlal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, assailed the findings in the impugned order, contending that, by dismissing the application the lower court had prevented the petitioner from letting in best evidence. It is contended that the expert opinion would have aided the petit....