https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402747 The High Court upheld the lower court's decision, dismissing the petitioner's application for expert opinion on cheques entries. The court found sending the cheques for expert opinion unnecessary as the petitioner did not dispute his signature or the amount entered. The petitioner's acknowledgment of liability in an agreement further supported this decision, leading to the dismissal of the Criminal Miscellaneous Case. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402747 The High Court upheld the lower court's decision, dismissing the petitioner's application for expert opinion on cheques entries. The court found sending the cheques for expert opinion unnecessary as the petitioner did not dispute his signature or the amount entered. The petitioner's acknowledgment of liability in an agreement further supported this decision, leading to the dismissal of the Criminal Miscellaneous Case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402747