Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (11) TMI 20

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ns have been referred at the instance of the Revenue and one question has been referred at the instance of the assessee for the opinion of this court. Question No. 2 referred at the instance of the Revenue and the sole question referred at the instance of the assessee are covered by our decision in Income-tax Reference No. 149 of 1980 (CIT v. Ravinder Kumar [1989] 180 ITR 203 (P & H)), rendered to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he effect that the Tribunal was right in not including the share of the assessee's wife in the firm in which he was a partner in his representative capacity as karta of his Hindu undivided family, under section 64(1)(ii) of the Incometax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"). It was pointed out on behalf of the Revenue that a special leave petition has been granted against the decision in Anand Sarup's ....