https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23931 The Court treated an earlier identical decision as binding and held that the share of the assessee's minor daughter from firms where he acted as karta could not be included in his total income under section 64(1)(ii). The connected referred questions were also disposed of by following the companion decision delivered the same day, with those questions answered in favour of the Revenue. The reference was thus answered partly for the assessee and partly for the Revenue, but the clubbing issue was decided against inclusion in the assessee's income. en-us Wed, 16 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:03:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23931 The Court treated an earlier identical decision as binding and held that the share of the assessee's minor daughter from firms where he acted as karta could not be included in his total income under section 64(1)(ii). The connected referred questions were also disposed of by following the companion decision delivered the same day, with those questions answered in favour of the Revenue. The reference was thus answered partly for the assessee and partly for the Revenue, but the clubbing issue was decided against inclusion in the assessee's income. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 16 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23931