2020 (9) TMI 753
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... For the State : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal , Panel Lawyer ORDER 1. Heard on admission and formulation of substantial question of law in this second appeal preferred by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the CPC against the impugned judgment and decree passed by the first appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree by which the trial Court dismissed the suit finding no merits.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....0.037 hectare was purchased by his father namely Manharanlal on 08/05/1981 in the name of plaintiff's uncle defendant No. 1 namely Bankelal by making payment of the sale consideration amount to the seller Ameena Bai. It is also the case of the plaintiff that earlier plaintiff's father was in possession of the suit property and after his death, plaintiff came into possession of the suit pro....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e right to recover property held benami. Section 4 (1) of the Act provides that no suit, claim or action to enforce any right in respect of any property held benami against the person in whose name the property is held or against any other person shall lie by or on behalf of a person claiming to be the real owner of such property. 7. The Supreme Court, in the matter of Om Prakash v. Jai Prakash....
TaxTMI