https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398634 The Court dismissed the second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC, affirming the lower Courts' decisions to dismiss the suit for declaration of title. The appellant failed to prove the purchase of the property in the name of defendant No. 1, as required by the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988, which prohibits suits to enforce rights in benami property. The judgment emphasized the Act's total prohibition against such suits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and upholding the lower Courts' decisions. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398634 The Court dismissed the second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC, affirming the lower Courts' decisions to dismiss the suit for declaration of title. The appellant failed to prove the purchase of the property in the name of defendant No. 1, as required by the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988, which prohibits suits to enforce rights in benami property. The judgment emphasized the Act's total prohibition against such suits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and upholding the lower Courts' decisions. Case-Laws Benami Property Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398634