TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (2) TMI 1283
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... pending before the Tis Hazari Courts at Delhi. Civil Suit No. 43 of 2009 was filed by the respondents herein for declaration and injunction in respect of the plaint schedule property. In respect of very same property, the appellant herein also filed a suit seeking permanent injunction and that suit has been numbered as Civil Suit No. 44 of 2009. The suits were consolidated on 26.09.2005. Much bef....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... suit was another suit titled as Mange Ram Vs. Chander Kanta etc. vide its order dated 8.12.2007. 3. That while passing the order of consolidation dated 8.12.2007, this Hon'ble Court ordered as under :- "It has been so urged on behalf of both contesting sides that trial in two cases be conducted commonly and evidence led in either case be read in both these cases." 4. That directions or ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ne the PW1 in Ram Rati Vs. Mange Ram etc. may kindly be granted to the applicant." 3. By order dated 15.04.2008 of the Additional District Judge, Delhi in Civil Suit No. 43 of 2009 filed by the respondents, the suit as against Defendant Nos. 5 and 6 was rejected, holding that the plaint did not disclose any cause of action against them. Defendant Nos. 5 was the plaintiff in Suit No. 44 of 2009 an....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iff in Civil Suit No. 44 of 2009, which has already been recorded, to be treated as the main suit. 6. We shall extract the order dated 24.02.2010, which reads as follows :- "Since the facts in this suit and suit No. 43/09 are intertwined even though Plaintiff is no more a party to suit No. 43/09, her claim for declaration to suit property therein may have refletion on the entitlement of Plainti....