https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289763 The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal of the suits. The judgment clarified the status of the parties post-consolidation, maintaining the order of consolidation dated 8.12.2007. The court highlighted oversight in previous orders and directed prompt resolution of pending suits within a month, without imposing costs. The issue of recalling under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC was not addressed in the judgment despite arguments presented by the appellant's counsel. en-us Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:26:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289763 The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal of the suits. The judgment clarified the status of the parties post-consolidation, maintaining the order of consolidation dated 8.12.2007. The court highlighted oversight in previous orders and directed prompt resolution of pending suits within a month, without imposing costs. The issue of recalling under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC was not addressed in the judgment despite arguments presented by the appellant's counsel. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289763