Cestat Delhi order

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....estat Delhi order<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - Amresh kumar Dated:- 20-8-2020 Last Reply Date:- 20-8-2020 Other Topics<br>Got 7 Replies<br>Indian Laws<br>Sir/ madam, Unable to find the CESTAT Delhi order in appeal no 5236 of 1992 = 2001 (3) TMI 153 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI. Pl help Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: Write name of the party and also your email I&#39;d. I shall email y....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ou. Reply By Amresh kumar: The Reply: Sir, The name of the party is G.T.C. industries.The order is by CESTAT Delhi. My mail I&#39;d is- [email protected] Regards Amresh kumar Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: I want date of decision or year. Issue in brief. Reply By Amresh kumar: The Reply: The date of decision is 27/10/2010. Issue is regarding joint liability. Reply By KAST....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....URI SETHI: The Reply: CESTAT&#39;s order dated 27.7.10 = 2010 (10) TMI 645 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI in respect of GTC Industries Ltd. is about undervaluation and MRP. That order stands confirmed by Supreme Court on 27.8.12 = 2012 (11) TMI 886 - SUPREME COURT. Either date of order of CESTAT is wrong or OIA no.5236 is wrong. Pl. clarify. Reply By Amresh kumar: The Reply: Sir, It is CESTAT&#39;s order....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dated 27.10.10 = 2010 (10) TMI 645 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI in respect of GTC Industries Ltd. is about undervaluation and MRP. It is Excise appeal no 5236 of 92 = 2001 (3) TMI 153 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI and CESTAT order no is 751-754/2010 dated 28.10.10 where GTC was exenorated from joint liability and only penalty was levied. Yes, that order stands confirmed by Supreme Court in civil appea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l no 1466, 1468 and 1469 of 2011 vide order dated 27.08.2012 = 2012 (11) TMI 886 - SUPREME COURT Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: Dear Amresh Ji, 2011(264) E.L.T. 433 (Tri. - Del.) = 2010 (10) TMI 645 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI GTC INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI 2012 (286) E.L.T. 340 (S.C.) = 2012 (11) TMI 886 - SUPREME COURT GTC INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRA....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....L EXCISE, NEW DELHI<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....