Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (8) TMI 377

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....isionist : Aditya Pandey ORDER HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA,J. The defects as have been reported by the Stamp Reporter are being ignored in view of the prevailing COVID-19 infection. The applicant was carrying on the business of sales and purchase of paper and after it was assessed by the authorities on 5.3.2018, a demand of Rs. 48,52,686/- was raised. The applicant under section 32 of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....peal. The Second Appellate Court, however, after entertaining the appeal, granted an order by which 90% of the disputed amount was stayed. Aggrieved thereof by the fact that the complete demand was not stayed, the applicant filed the instant Revision. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that as per section 29(6) of the Act, no proceedings could have continued after the en....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rted in Sarve Shree Sunny Edible Products Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow vs. State of U.P., Thru. Principal Secretary, Tax & Registration & Ors. reported in 2013 NTN (Vol.51) 153. Learned Standing Counsel, however, in reply to the various propositions raised in the questions of law as had been framed by the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the stay of 90% of the demand was an order sufficie....