https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397434 The High Court held that the proceedings against the applicant exceeded the limitation period under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008. The court emphasized the need for a complete stay on recovery during the appeal process to safeguard the applicant's rights. It was ruled that the disputed demand would remain stayed for four months or until the disposal of the First Appeal, whichever is earlier. The judgment underscored the significance of respecting statutory limitations and ensuring procedural fairness in tax cases. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:17:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397434 The High Court held that the proceedings against the applicant exceeded the limitation period under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008. The court emphasized the need for a complete stay on recovery during the appeal process to safeguard the applicant's rights. It was ruled that the disputed demand would remain stayed for four months or until the disposal of the First Appeal, whichever is earlier. The judgment underscored the significance of respecting statutory limitations and ensuring procedural fairness in tax cases. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 06 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397434