2020 (8) TMI 298
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of 2014 - -<br>Customs<br>HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH For Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Jayaraj For Respondents : Mr. A.P. Srinivas, SC for R1 Mr. Velayutham Pichai, SPC for R2 and R3 O R D E R Today, the matter is called through video conferencing. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved against the Mahazar dated....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... on 21.12.2017. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, there were no further proceedings after the receipt of the reply. 5. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the writ petition challenging the Mahazar is not maintainable and therefore seeks for dismissal of the writ petition. 6. The issue as to whether the writ petition could be....