https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397355 The Court did not delve into the maintainability issue of the writ petition challenging the Mahazar as the respondents were proceeding with the demand of the differential duty. The Customs authorities were directed to consider the petitioner's reply and proceed with the demand, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner. The Court mandated completion of this consideration within 12 weeks and allowed for a personal hearing through video conferencing if necessary. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2020 08:07:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397355 The Court did not delve into the maintainability issue of the writ petition challenging the Mahazar as the respondents were proceeding with the demand of the differential duty. The Customs authorities were directed to consider the petitioner's reply and proceed with the demand, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner. The Court mandated completion of this consideration within 12 weeks and allowed for a personal hearing through video conferencing if necessary. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397355