1956 (8) TMI 70

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le which I issued on the 14th June 1956 at the instance of the State against an order made by Special Jude I. M. Lal on the 21st April 1956. 2. The opposite party Yash Pal who was a prosecuting Sub-Inspector was being tiled by the Special Judge for an offence under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and I am informed that two points were taken against the prosecution by the learn....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ice. The appointment in the present case was by a person of the rank of a Superintendent of Police & the sanction given is by a person who ranks higher than the Superintendent of Police, i.e., the Deputy Inspector-General of Police. I do not think that any attack can be levelled on the ground of the sanction not being proper. In AIR 1949 PC J12 (A), a person was appointed by the Inspector-Gener....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....50 continued to remain in force under Article 372(1) of the Constitution of India, and Article 246 does not apply to any Act which was already in existence. The Allahabad High Court in Sagar Mal v. The State, AIR 1951 All 816 (B), held that the distribution of legislative powers under Article 246 of the Constitution does not affect the laws which were in existence and in force previous to the c....