<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (8) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287905</link>
    <description>The court found the sanction under Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act to be valid, emphasizing the competence of the authority granting the sanction. Regarding the applicability of the Indian Police Act to Punjab, the court held that pre-constitutional laws, including the Police Act, remained valid unless conflicting with the Constitution. The judgment overturned the Special Judge&#039;s order, remitting the case for trial before the Sessions Judge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 13:16:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (8) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287905</link>
      <description>The court found the sanction under Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act to be valid, emphasizing the competence of the authority granting the sanction. Regarding the applicability of the Indian Police Act to Punjab, the court held that pre-constitutional laws, including the Police Act, remained valid unless conflicting with the Constitution. The judgment overturned the Special Judge&#039;s order, remitting the case for trial before the Sessions Judge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>