Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1991 (3) TMI 69

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Y C. J.-Under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has stated the following two questions : "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the extra amount of Rs. 2,07,943 realised as enhanced price as a result of the High Court's decision had not accrued in the year and did not form part of the income of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....So far as question No. 2 is concerned, it is equally covered by another decision of this court in CIT v. H. R. Sugar Factory P. Ltd. [1991] 187 ITR 363, and is answered against the assessee. We may briefly state the facts relevant to question No. 2. The assessee is a private limited company engaged in manufacture of sugar. During the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1972-73, the ass....