<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 69 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22197</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of the enhanced price as income, following the precedent in Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. case. However, the court ruled against the assessee concerning the deduction of interest on loans, upholding the disallowance based on the borrowed funds being lent interest-free to directors and a related firm. The judgment was delivered by B. P. JEEVAN REDDY C. J., with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:39:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 69 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22197</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of the enhanced price as income, following the precedent in Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. case. However, the court ruled against the assessee concerning the deduction of interest on loans, upholding the disallowance based on the borrowed funds being lent interest-free to directors and a related firm. The judgment was delivered by B. P. JEEVAN REDDY C. J., with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>