2020 (4) TMI 238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stice T.R. Ravi For the Petitioner : By Adv. Sri. Ramesh Cherian John For the Respondent : Sr. GP. V. K. Shamsudheen JUDGMENT ABDUL REHIM, J. The writ petitioner is challenging judgment of the Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.3521/2020, dated 10th February, 2020. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. Exts.P12 and P13 orders imposing penalty under Sectio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, because there is no material available to arrive at any conclusion that the principles of natural justice is flouted. 3. Before this court, it was contended that, there occurred failure on the part of the 1st respondent in considering the objections submitted by the appellant to the notices issued proposing imposition of penalty(Exts....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng the request of the appellant. But on 31.01.2019 also, the appellant submitted applications for adjournment stating the very same reasons. It is pertinent to note that, in none of the applications submitted, either on 17.01.2019 or on 31.01.2019, there is no mention about any objections submitted to the proposal notices. But in the writ petition the appellant had produced Exts.P10 and P11 as cop....