<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 238 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394331</link>
    <description>Penalty orders under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act were challenged on the ground of breach of natural justice and non-consideration of objections. The record showed that personal hearing was offered, adjournments were sought for filing returns and remitting tax, and those requests did not refer to any objections against the proposal notices. As the departmental file did not show receipt of objections, the material basis for alleging non-consideration was not established. On that footing, no violation of natural justice was made out, and there was no reason to disturb the Single Judge&#039;s refusal to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=609680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 238 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394331</link>
      <description>Penalty orders under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act were challenged on the ground of breach of natural justice and non-consideration of objections. The record showed that personal hearing was offered, adjournments were sought for filing returns and remitting tax, and those requests did not refer to any objections against the proposal notices. As the departmental file did not show receipt of objections, the material basis for alleging non-consideration was not established. On that footing, no violation of natural justice was made out, and there was no reason to disturb the Single Judge&#039;s refusal to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>