2020 (3) TMI 299

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h: Mr. Prabhakar Pandey, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms. Priynaka Rai, Advocate for respondent No.2 JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) CRL.L.P. 114/2018 CRL.L.P. 115/2018 CRL.L.P. 116/2018 CRL.L.P. 117/2018 CRL.L.P. 118/2018 Vide above captioned five petitions, petitioner is seeking leave to file appeal against the order dated 13th December, 201....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g that the impugned order suffers from no infirmity and these petitions deserve dismissal. Heard. The submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties have been heard and in view of the fact that non-appearance of the petitioner was neither intentional nor deliberate, this Court finds it to be a fit case for grant of leave. In view of aforesaid, these petitions are allowed and are ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submits that in all, twenty three complaints have been filed by the petitioner against the respondent and these complaints were listed on 3rd October, 2017 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate and since the complainant had not appeared on the said date, the matters were adjourned to 11th January, 2018. It is stated that the appellant was under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and these appeals are supported by affidavits of appellant and, therefore in the interest of justice, impugned order of 13th December, 2017 be set aside and appellant's complaints be restored. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents has opposed these appeals on the ground that the impugned order suffers from no illegality or infirmity. After hearing learned coun....