<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 299 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393155</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, setting aside the order of dismissal for non-appearance under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court directed the parties to appear before the trial court for further proceedings, emphasizing the importance of hearing and deciding the cases on merit rather than dismissing them for non-appearance. The judgment aimed to uphold the principles of justice and fairness in the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 299 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393155</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, setting aside the order of dismissal for non-appearance under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court directed the parties to appear before the trial court for further proceedings, emphasizing the importance of hearing and deciding the cases on merit rather than dismissing them for non-appearance. The judgment aimed to uphold the principles of justice and fairness in the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>