2011 (5) TMI 1105

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en on Board. Heard. We find no merit in the special leave petitions and they are dismissed accordingly. However, we grant six months' time from today to the petitioner to vacate the premises in question on furnishing usual undertaking before this Court within six weeks from today." From a perusal of the above order, it is evident that the tenant had to vacate the premises in question within six CONTEMPT PETITION(C) NOS.140-144/2011 months' from the date of dismissal of the special leave petitions and to furnish usual undertaking within six weeks from that date. It is extremely unfortunate that neither an undertaking was furnished nor did the tenant vacate the premises in question on the expiry of six months, i.e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ngh Jain Charitable Trust-the tenant by giving it six months time from that date to vacate the premises in question on furnishing usual undertaking before this Court within six weeks from that date. Despite that Order, the petitioner in the original Special Leave Petitions Nos. 27755-27759 of 2010 has not vacated the premises in question nor did it file any undertaking before this Court. Instead, to frustrate the Order of this Court dated 06.10.2010 it got some persons to file frivolous objections before the executing court. One objector is none else than the son of one of the trustees of the tenant-trust, another objector is one of the trustees claiming to be the sub-tenant. In our opinion, such conduct is contemptuous and is simp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g. She shall also show cause why contempt proceedings be not taken against her and a recommendation be made by this Court for her immediate suspension. Notice may be served dasti to Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner in the original Special Leave Petitions Nos. 27755-27759 of 2010. Copy of this Order shall be given to the alleged contemnors and Archna Sinha, Additional District Judge Central, Delhi, forthwith. " Today, when the case was taken up for hearing at 11.25 a.m., senior counsels appeared on behalf of the alleged sub-tenants and stated that their clients will vacate the premises. Hence, we directed that possession be handed over to the landlord by 12.30 p.m. today and we directed this case ....