<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1105 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286093</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed special leave petitions against the Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment, upholding the landlord&#039;s right to evict the tenant. The tenant&#039;s failure to vacate the premises led to contempt petitions. The Court condemned the tenant&#039;s attempts to circumvent the order and involve alleged sub-tenants, leading to further litigation. Criticizing the Additional District Judge&#039;s stay of possession warrant as judicial misconduct, the Court quashed the stay order and directed disciplinary action. After possession handover, contempt notices were discharged, with the landlord advised to pursue unpaid dues separately. Emphasizing respect for court orders and integrity in judiciary, the case highlighted the need for timely compliance and prevention of malpractices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:14:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1105 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286093</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed special leave petitions against the Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment, upholding the landlord&#039;s right to evict the tenant. The tenant&#039;s failure to vacate the premises led to contempt petitions. The Court condemned the tenant&#039;s attempts to circumvent the order and involve alleged sub-tenants, leading to further litigation. Criticizing the Additional District Judge&#039;s stay of possession warrant as judicial misconduct, the Court quashed the stay order and directed disciplinary action. After possession handover, contempt notices were discharged, with the landlord advised to pursue unpaid dues separately. Emphasizing respect for court orders and integrity in judiciary, the case highlighted the need for timely compliance and prevention of malpractices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>