Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (2) TMI 382

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ani, Advocates JUDGEMENT DR. ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013 for being aggrieved by the order dated 22nd January 2019 of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT in short), Mumbai Division II, Mumbai. They are basically aggrieved with the order of NCLT Mumbai in respect of "not alienate any of the assets of the company until further orders in CP No.2440/241- 242/MB/2018". Respondent in the present appeal Mr. Kanji Bhanji Shah and Mr. vadilal Kunverji Gada have approached NCLT Mumbai to grant multiple reliefs including not allowing any transfer of shares by the respondent in the main petition until final order is passed by the NCLT; to rest....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....no share transfer agreement and there was no share transfer form signed by the Respondents and no consideration were passed. They are alleging for some forged signatures on some of the certificates Page 10 para L of the appeal. The appellants have also made their submission that the Respondent in the appeal, no doubt, were appointed as director of the appellant company in December, 2010 but resigned from the company in February, 2012 and they are not holding any qualifications shares and unable to get any shares within the prescribed time limit. It is also revealed that the Respondent in the appeal have filed a complaint before ROC on 22nd April, 2016 and the said complaint was closed by ROC on 6th November, 2017. It is also observed fro....