https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391938 Interference with a temporary interim order was declined because the main company petition remained pending and the directions did not finally determine the rights of the parties. Disputed questions over shareholding, transfer documents and alleged forgery required adjudication by the Tribunal, and the respondents' grievance was treated as falling within the oppression and mismanagement framework under the Companies Act, 2013. The appellants were left free to raise their defence in the pending proceedings, and the interim restraint on alienation of assets and production of records was not disturbed. en-us Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 May 2020 17:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391938 Interference with a temporary interim order was declined because the main company petition remained pending and the directions did not finally determine the rights of the parties. Disputed questions over shareholding, transfer documents and alleged forgery required adjudication by the Tribunal, and the respondents' grievance was treated as falling within the oppression and mismanagement framework under the Companies Act, 2013. The appellants were left free to raise their defence in the pending proceedings, and the interim restraint on alienation of assets and production of records was not disturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391938