Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (12) TMI 1211

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. Sham Walve for the Appellants in all Appeals. Mr. Ruturaj H. Gurjar for the Respondents. P.C. : All these Appeals have been admitted on the same substantial question of law and they are disposed of by this common order. 2. Appeal No. 378 of 2006 relates to Assessment Year 2000-01. Appeal No. 380 of 2006 relates to Assessment Year 1999- 00. Appeal No. 381 of 2006 relates to Assessm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Officer had disallowed the price paid by the Respondents - Assessees to its members as well as non-members as it was in variance with the minimum ex-factory price fixed by the Central Government under Clause 3(1) in Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 as revised from time to time. The Respondent were assessed by the Assessing Officer accordingly. The Respondents - Assessees, being aggrieved by the ord....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appeals. First the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in C.I.T. v. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom) is placed on record. Further, the learned Counsel points out that the view taken in this decision came up for consideration of the Supreme Court in a group of Petitions which were disposed of by the Supreme Court in a decision in Deputy C.I.T. v. Shr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (Appeals) for reconsideration, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Tasgaon Taluka SSK Ltd. wherein the Apex Court had sent the proceedings to the Assessing Officer, they will have to be sent to the Assessing Officer. 8. In view of this consensus at the bar, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed. The impugned orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal an....