<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1211 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390328</link>
    <description>Binding later High Court and Supreme Court decisions governed the recurring question of disallowance of excess cane price paid by sugarcane co-operative societies to members and non-members. In light of that settled legal position, the appellate orders could not be sustained and were set aside. The matter was remitted to the assessing officer for fresh consideration in accordance with the Supreme Court rulings, rather than being restored to the Commissioner (Appeals). The disallowance issue was not finally decided on its merits in these appeals; the operative effect was quashing of the impugned orders and reassessment under the governing precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2019 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=598760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1211 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390328</link>
      <description>Binding later High Court and Supreme Court decisions governed the recurring question of disallowance of excess cane price paid by sugarcane co-operative societies to members and non-members. In light of that settled legal position, the appellate orders could not be sustained and were set aside. The matter was remitted to the assessing officer for fresh consideration in accordance with the Supreme Court rulings, rather than being restored to the Commissioner (Appeals). The disallowance issue was not finally decided on its merits in these appeals; the operative effect was quashing of the impugned orders and reassessment under the governing precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>