2019 (12) TMI 411
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or the Petitioner. Mr. Arvind Pinto for Respondent No.1. P.C. : By this review petition, the Review Petitioner is seeking review of the oral judgment and order dated 27 August 2014 passed in Writ Petition No.127 of 2007. 2. In the writ petition, the Petitioner had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax refusing to entertain the Revision Application filed by the P....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er through the film laboratory, would be aware of the same. The Division Bench noticed that in the petition, no mention was made abut the attachment of the film. The Division Bench, accordingly, came to the conclusion that this suppression of facts made the case of the Petitioner regarding service of notice doubtful. The Division Bench also made observations regarding postal acknowledgment of t....
TaxTMI