https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389528 The Division Bench rejected the review petition challenging the refusal of the Commissioner of Income Tax to entertain the Revision Application against the assessment order. The Bench found that the Petitioner's suppression of facts regarding the attachment of the film raised doubts about the service of notice, and the review petition was deemed to be seeking rehearing on concluded issues. The Court held that it could not entertain the grounds raised in the review jurisdiction and noted that the Petitioner had the remedy to challenge the judgment and order under review through appropriate legal channels. en-us Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:22:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389528 The Division Bench rejected the review petition challenging the refusal of the Commissioner of Income Tax to entertain the Revision Application against the assessment order. The Bench found that the Petitioner's suppression of facts regarding the attachment of the film raised doubts about the service of notice, and the review petition was deemed to be seeking rehearing on concluded issues. The Court held that it could not entertain the grounds raised in the review jurisdiction and noted that the Petitioner had the remedy to challenge the judgment and order under review through appropriate legal channels. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389528