Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1993 (7) TMI 72

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for one Shri Karnail Singh, son of Harnam Singh, has filed this petition under articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No. 2, Income-tax Officer, to refund the amount of Rs. 57,527 along with interest thereon which, as stated, was illegally recovered from him out of F. D. R. No. 228 of 1981 for Rs. 82,300 with Punjab Nati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing heard. Karnail Singh who was a non-resident Indian, it is stated, was never issued any notice of any kind at any stage whatsoever. Karnail Singh approached the Income-tax Officer by way of a representation letter dated February 22, 1990. He enquired the nature of demand and also requested that a copy of the order passed against him be supplied to him. His demand in the letter forwarded is said....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dated May 16, 1991, but with no result. The reminders given by Karnail Singh also likewise never received any attention on the part of the Income tax Commissioner. In the wake of the circumstances aforesaid, the petitioner approached this court for the relief as stated in the earlier part of this order. Notice of motion was issued in this case on October 21, 1991, and the case was adjourned to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....within six months. Till date, no reply has been filed in this case. Mr. Sawhney, counsel appearing for the respondent, requests for yet another opportunity to file the reply by still saying that the file is not traceable even now. In view of the repeated adjournments that have been given in this case as also in view of the fact that no return had been filed even though the case was ordered to b....