Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1991 (1) TMI 452

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t family property claiming one-third share in it. The suit was contested by the father and the brother, but the Subordinate Judge accepted the Appellant's claim and passed a preliminary decree by his order dated December 26, 1973 declaring that the Appellant as well as his father and brother each were entitled to one-third share in the property. 4. The Defendants preferred appeal before the High Court against the preliminary decree. The High Court by its judgment dated October 15, 1984 confirmed the findings of the trial court with the direction that an appropriate provision should be made for the maintenance and marriage expenses of Respondents 2 to 5 who were unmarried sisters of the Appellant. The High Court directed that the expe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ince the preliminary decree had already been passed prior to the amended provision, the High Court committed an error in directing the trial court to allot shares to the unmarried daughters. Admittedly, under the unamended Act, women and unmarried daughters of a Hindu Mitakshara family were not entitled to any share in the joint family property. The State of Andhra Pradesh removed the injustice to the daughters so far as that State was covered by introducing the concerned amendment in the Act. The newly introducing Section 29-A reads as under. 29-A. Equal rights to daughter in coparcenary property. - Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 6 of this Act- (i) in a Joint Hindu Family governed by Mitakshara law, the daughter of a c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ughter married prior to or to a partition which had been effected before the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1986." 9. It is obvious that under the aforesaid provision, the difference between daughter and son of the Mitakshara Hindu family is removed and the daughter is conferred the coparcenary rights in the joint family property by birth in the same manner and to the same extent as the son. She is, therefore, now entitled to claim partition and her share in the family property. The amending provision is a beneficial legislation which, among other things, is also directed towards eradicating social evils such as dowry and dowry deaths. It also achieves the constitutional mandate of equality between s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... A partition of the joint Hindu family can be effected by various modes, viz., by a family settlement, by a registered instrument of partition, by oral arrangement by the parties, or by a decree of the court. When a suit for partition is filed in a court, a preliminary decree is passed determining shares of the members of the family. The final decree follows, thereafter, allotting specific properties and directing the partition of the immovable properties by metes and bounds. Unless and until the final decree is passed and the allottees of the shares are put in possession of the respective property, the partition is not complete. The preliminary decree which determines shares does not bring about the final partition. For, pending the final ....