https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283400 Section 29-A was held to confer daughters the same coparcenary rights as sons, and the beneficial amendment had to be applied to pending partition proceedings. A preliminary decree only declared shares and did not complete partition, because the shares could still change until a final decree was passed and the property was divided by metes and bounds. Clause (iv) excluded only partitions already effected before commencement of the amendment, meaning a completed and irreversible partition, not a mere severance of status or declaration of shares. As the final decree had not been passed, the unmarried daughters were entitled to their share in the joint Hindu family property. en-us Fri, 18 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Sep 2019 10:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283400 Section 29-A was held to confer daughters the same coparcenary rights as sons, and the beneficial amendment had to be applied to pending partition proceedings. A preliminary decree only declared shares and did not complete partition, because the shares could still change until a final decree was passed and the property was divided by metes and bounds. Clause (iv) excluded only partitions already effected before commencement of the amendment, meaning a completed and irreversible partition, not a mere severance of status or declaration of shares. As the final decree had not been passed, the unmarried daughters were entitled to their share in the joint Hindu family property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283400