2019 (8) TMI 1138

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shakshi Pandey & Mr. Shekhar, Advocates. Respondent Through: Mr. D.P. Singh, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. B. Naveen Kumar, Mr. Manu Mishra & Ms. Mallika, Advocates. O R D E R Impugned order of 6th August, 2019, declines to supply petitioner's statement recorded under Section 50(2) of The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Learned counsel for pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under Section 50 of The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 whereas, no such presumption is attached to the statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. and after the investigation, the statements recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. are supplied to the accused. Thus, quashing of impugned order was sought while relying upon Supreme Court's decision in 'K.T. Advani Vs. The State 1984 SCC ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Needless to say that in the instant case also, after completion of investigation in this case, copy of petitioner's statement under Section 50 of The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 would be supplied. Petitioner is accused of an offence under The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 which poses serious threat not only to the financial system of the country but also its integrity and s....