https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384949 During a crucial stage of an ongoing PMLA investigation, the Delhi HC held that a person cannot compel disclosure of a statement recorded under Section 50 on natural justice grounds, because an accused has no right to direct the manner or timing of investigation. The Court noted that investigative statements are ordinarily not supplied during investigation and are instead furnished after completion, as with Section 161 CrPC material. It accepted that the requested statement would be provided after the investigation concluded, and upheld the refusal to disclose it at the initial stage. en-us Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384949 During a crucial stage of an ongoing PMLA investigation, the Delhi HC held that a person cannot compel disclosure of a statement recorded under Section 50 on natural justice grounds, because an accused has no right to direct the manner or timing of investigation. The Court noted that investigative statements are ordinarily not supplied during investigation and are instead furnished after completion, as with Section 161 CrPC material. It accepted that the requested statement would be provided after the investigation concluded, and upheld the refusal to disclose it at the initial stage. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384949