2019 (8) TMI 298

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... K. KARUNAKARAN SMT. LEKSHMI P. NAIR AND SRI. ARJUN SATHISH KUMAR For The Respondents : ADV. SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX JUDGMENT These writ petitions are filed challenging Ext.P2 in WP(C)No.3278 of 2019 and Ext.P3 in WP(C)No.3264 of 2019 seeking direction to the first respondent to consider the compounding application submitted by the petitioner after hearing the petitioner. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s contained in Ext.P1, the issue will be reconsidered with notice to the petitioner and after hearing the petitioner also. 5. Having considered the contentions advanced, I am of the opinion that the demand notices which are issued without reference to Ext.P1 judgment cannot survive. Ext.P2 in WP(C)No.3278 of 2019 and Ext.P3 in WP(C)No.3264 of 2019 are accordingly set aside. The respondents shal....