<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 298 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384109</link>
    <description>The court set aside the demand notices issued without considering a compounding application per a previous judgment. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the compounding applications within three months, deferring coercive proceedings against the petitioner until then. The petitioner was instructed to provide relevant documents for compliance. The writ petitions were granted in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 13:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 298 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384109</link>
      <description>The court set aside the demand notices issued without considering a compounding application per a previous judgment. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the compounding applications within three months, deferring coercive proceedings against the petitioner until then. The petitioner was instructed to provide relevant documents for compliance. The writ petitions were granted in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>