1995 (11) TMI 27

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in filing the review application is condoned. Civil miscellaneous is allowed. Civil Miscellaneous Nos. 8069 of 1994 and 2894 of 1995 : The writ petition was allowed on May 19, 1994, for the refund of Rs. 84,500 in six weeks. We did not however, pass any order as to interest payable by the respondents. The petitioner filed a special leave petition before the Supreme Court claiming interest bu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e. We, therefore, do not think that there is any prohibition on the petitioner in filing a review application in this court as he was advised that it would be appropriate for him to approach this court instead of the Supreme Court. As to the right of the petitioner to claim interest, we find the seizure was on January 5, 1988, and the amount became ultimately refundable from January 6, 1988, ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....It is possible that it was lost in transit when sent by the Income-tax Department to respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Counsel for the Commissioner of Income-tax, respondent No. 4, says that they had returned the demand draft within 10 days of its receipt by registered post. Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 to 3, however, denies that the demand draft was returned by the 4th respondent. But inasmuch as the de....