https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18057 The delay in filing the review application was condoned, and the civil miscellaneous was allowed. The court found that the petitioner was entitled to interest on the refund amount due to deprivation of use of the money. Respondents were directed to pay interest at 12% from the date the amount became refundable. The court rejected the contention that filing a special leave petition barred the review application, allowing the review application after withdrawal of the special leave petition. Respondents were ordered to pay interest, and the cases were disposed of. en-us Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:18:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18057 The delay in filing the review application was condoned, and the civil miscellaneous was allowed. The court found that the petitioner was entitled to interest on the refund amount due to deprivation of use of the money. Respondents were directed to pay interest at 12% from the date the amount became refundable. The court rejected the contention that filing a special leave petition barred the review application, allowing the review application after withdrawal of the special leave petition. Respondents were ordered to pay interest, and the cases were disposed of. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18057