2019 (5) TMI 305
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT For The RESPONDENT : SMT. A. S. BEENU, SRI. BINU MATHEW, SRI. B. J. JOHN PRAKASH, SRI. JOSEPH MARKOS (SR. ), SRI. MATHEWS K. UTHUPPACHAN, SRI. TERRY V. JAMES, SRI. TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL), SRI. V. ABRAHAM MARKOS AND SRI. V. B. UNNIRAJ JUDGMENT P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J. This is an appeal preferred by the Revenue. Challenge is against Annexure-C order pa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....while some reliefs were declined. This made the assessee to file a further appeal before the Tribunal and after hearing both the sides, the Tribunal interdicted the order passed by the Appellate Authority and granted some reliefs vide Annexure-C order, which is under challenge as mentioned above. 4. The appellant has suggested some questions as involving substantial questions of law, which are ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....opened by the Assessing Officer as per Annexure-A order dated 16.3.2001. The appeal preferred before the Commissioner, Income Tax (Appeals) was not fruitful to the requisite extent, which made the assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing further appeal. The version put forth by the assessee was accepted and leave was granted; which in turn is under challenge. Similar issue has already been cons....
TaxTMI