<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 305 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379577</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s Annexure-C order for the assessment year 1989-90. The appellant contested the allowance of claims for advertisement expenses and loss on the sale of NHPC Bonds. The Court found no substantial question of law under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, thereby upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 305 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379577</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s Annexure-C order for the assessment year 1989-90. The appellant contested the allowance of claims for advertisement expenses and loss on the sale of NHPC Bonds. The Court found no substantial question of law under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, thereby upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>