2016 (9) TMI 1501
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nnose, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S. Nagalingam, AC (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - Appellant says that consequent upon valuation of the goods following Ujagar Prints Etc. v. Union of India & Ors. reported in 1989 (39) E.L.T. 493 (S.C.), the duty aspect has been rightly determined. There is no dispute on that aspect. But there was denial of c....
TaxTMI