<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1501 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, rejecting the inclusion of cash discount and trade discount in the valuation of goods. Additionally, the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was waived due to an interpretational error. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to legal principles in determining assessable values and the impact of interpretational errors in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:11:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1501 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, rejecting the inclusion of cash discount and trade discount in the valuation of goods. Additionally, the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was waived due to an interpretational error. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to legal principles in determining assessable values and the impact of interpretational errors in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>