2018 (7) TMI 1922
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....UMAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri Ravi Raghavan, Advocate for the Appellant (s) Shri A. K. Biswas, Suptd. (AR) for the Respondent(s) ORDER Per Bench: The issue relates to demand of Rs. 1,81,321/- alongwith interest and equivalent penalty against the Appellant. The demand has been confirmed on the shortage of finished goods on the date of visit of the Central Excise Officers, i. e. on 06....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ince the demand relates to the period prior to 26.05.1995 there is no question of any interest payable. The appellant also prays that penalty be dropped. 3. The Authorized Representative for the revenue supported the order of the authorities below. 4. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records. 5. We have heard both sides. The counsel for the appellant fairly submits that since the m....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI