<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1922 - CESTAT KOLATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280042</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLATA ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand for interest and the penalty imposed, while upholding the demand of Rs. 1,81,321 related to shortages of finished goods. The Tribunal considered the absence of interest provisions applicable during the relevant period and the age of the case, leading to the decision to not penalize the Appellant due to lack of available evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:52:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1922 - CESTAT KOLATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280042</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLATA ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demand for interest and the penalty imposed, while upholding the demand of Rs. 1,81,321 related to shortages of finished goods. The Tribunal considered the absence of interest provisions applicable during the relevant period and the age of the case, leading to the decision to not penalize the Appellant due to lack of available evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>