Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (10) TMI 998

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t Rs. 1,20,17,308/- against which the assessee has claimed expenses of Rs. 1,19,60,183/-. The return of income filed on 29.09.2008 declaring loss of Rs. 1,13,224/-. The Assessing Officer made addition of Rs. 12,85,255/- by invoking the provisions of section 43B for the reason that assessee has not submitted evidence to show that actual payment has been made before filing the return of income of Rs. 12,85,255/- as bonus. The CIT (A) confirmed the addition by holding as under :- " Thus any expenditure on a/c of payment of commission to an employee will be allowable as deduction under 36(1)(ii) irrespective of the fact whether the employee is a shareholder or not, only it is subject to the condition that it is not in lieu of dividend.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....overed under section 36(1)(ii) and are, therefore, allowable as deduction subject to the provisions of section 43B (c) of the Act. 1.2 That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in not appreciating that the performance linked incentives payable by the appellant to its employees is not covered under section 36(1)(ii) of the Act as the same are not dependent upon the profits of the appellant which is a sine qua non for applicability of the said section. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or vary the above grounds of appeal at or before the time of hearing." 4. While pleading on behalf of the assessee ld. AR submitted that this expenditure of Rs. 12,85,255/- was incurred by the assessee on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f bonus have been recognized and they are as follows : (a) Production bonus. (b) Contractual bonus. (c) Customary bonus usually associated with festivals. (d) Profit-sharing bonus. The "good work reward" that is given by the assessee to some employees on the recommendation of senior officers of the assessee does not fall in any one of these above categories. 37. For the purpose of section 36(1)(ii) of the Act, it has been held by this Court in CIT v. Kelvinator India Ltd. [IT Case No. 266 of 1983, decided on July 23, 1987] that bonus is related only to the profit that a company makes and is not relatable to production incentive. 38. The Revenue had challenged the decision of thi....