<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 998 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279768</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that the performance incentives were deductible as business expenditure under section 37(1) rather than being disallowed under section 36(1)(ii) as bonuses. This decision was influenced by the interpretation of relevant provisions and the precedent set in the case of Shriram Pistons &amp;amp; Rings Ltd. vs. CIT, emphasizing that such incentives were not profit-dependent and thus fell outside the scope of section 36(1)(ii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 06:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=565654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 998 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279768</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that the performance incentives were deductible as business expenditure under section 37(1) rather than being disallowed under section 36(1)(ii) as bonuses. This decision was influenced by the interpretation of relevant provisions and the precedent set in the case of Shriram Pistons &amp;amp; Rings Ltd. vs. CIT, emphasizing that such incentives were not profit-dependent and thus fell outside the scope of section 36(1)(ii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>