2019 (4) TMI 136
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....CHD/2017 1. The present appeal has been filed by under Section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 12th September, 2017 passed in O.A. no. 93 of 2017 by the Adjudicating Authority. 2. In the O.A. No. 93/2017, no specific allegation made against the appellant. No link and nexus prima facie shown with any accused, except at serial no. 16 of the said application w....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ich may relate to the Appellant. However, the AD has till date not provided any such information so far. 4. In reply to the O.A. 93 of 2017 filed by the Appellant, the Appellant had stated that in absence of any information as to whether any papers/documents/articles seized by the AD belong to or have any connection with the appellant, the appellant may be considered not being connected in the m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h belong to the Answering Respondent or may be related to the Answering Respondent but has not been provided any copy so Far. This reply of the Answering Respondent may thus be considered to be a preliminary reply and the Answering Respondent reserves its right to file a comprehensive and detailed reply upon receipt of copies of papers/documents/articles sought for. 12. That upon perusal of the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dent. 13. That save and exc[-ept the document referred to in para 9 above, which documents as such has no connection with the person/s searched by the learned AD prior to institution of the OA under reply, and that in absence of any information as to whether any papers/documents/articles seized by the learned AD belong to the Answering Respondent or have any connection with the Answering Respond....