https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377692 The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order in an appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The appellant's arguments of lack of specific allegations, absence of evidence linking them to accused parties, and failure to provide crucial information on seized documents were upheld. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence connecting the appellant to alleged offenses, leading to the decision to allow the appeal and delete the appellant's name as a respondent due to the lack of connection to the property transaction. The impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Apr 2019 07:29:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377692 The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order in an appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The appellant's arguments of lack of specific allegations, absence of evidence linking them to accused parties, and failure to provide crucial information on seized documents were upheld. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence connecting the appellant to alleged offenses, leading to the decision to allow the appeal and delete the appellant's name as a respondent due to the lack of connection to the property transaction. The impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377692